Well, ok, then.  The PRIMARY primary objective in voting for Johnson was
that I did not end up voting for a candidate who was so arrogant as to blow
off the preparations for the first debate that his advisers were
requesting, and who instead took a vacation day before that first debate.
 And then, to top it off, was so disconnected that he walked off the stage
thinking he and *won* the debate.

Didn't end up voting for him.  Nor for the Mormon dipshit.

--Doug

On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Robert Holmes <[email protected]>wrote:

> Yeah, because that never backfires: Ralph Nader, Florida, 2000.
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Douglas Roberts <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>>
>
>
>> Also, and primarily, that vote was a statement against the two party
>> system.
>>
>>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>



-- 
Doug Roberts
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins
<http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins>
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to