Yeah, I'm aware that my idea doesn't hold water -- just playing. Evidence
that we're not in a game is that the putative gamemaster didn't block my
note from appearing. If you hadn't responded, I would have had confirmation
of my idea.

Bruce


On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Arlo Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:

> But then that implies a false positive: if in other configurations we
> don't notice it as a puzzle, then we only (or are more likely to) notice
> the more 'puzzle-like' phenomena, and interpret that as meaning we are in a
> game.
> But is a game the same as a simulation? Sure, games can have elements of
> simulation (where I define simulation as recreating a system in perhaps
> simpler terms) but I believe it exists as a separate conceptual entity.
> Besides, it seems that all these discussions of whether we live in a real
> universe or not get caught up in circularity because we generally define
> reality *as* the universe.
> -Arlo James Barnes
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to