Not my terms. On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Pamela McCorduck <[email protected]> wrote:
> I haven’t heard the terms “thin problems” and “thick problems.” Are these > yours, Patrick? They’re wonderfully intuitive: if I hadn’t heard the terms > before, I still knew what you meant. Thanks. > > As for the techno-liberterians of Silicon Valley, it’s useless to remind > them that they ride on a grand government investment of half a century ago, > that none of them, individually, or collectively, would have made. But on > this, I save my breath to cool my soup. > > Pamela > > > On Dec 28, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Patrick Reilly <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Well, the main point I have (unless Nick's psychoanalysis of my thinly > submitted aggressiveness is the real story) is that I believe that there > are thin problems and thick problems, and that solvers of thin problems are > overly regarded in Silicon Valley culture. > > Such captains of industry think that, if they could have coded Twitter, > then they know all that they need to to address any discoverable problem > after a day or two's investigation. So the referenced article on the > dilemma of Physics will be a valuable reference for me in suggesting that > some problems are thick problems . . . and require extensive data-gathering. > > And yes, I am tired of hearing from techno-Libertarians that all political > problems and privacy rights issues are easily solvable by merely limiting > or hobbling government action. Particularly when IMHO there are currently > numerous private corporate entities that need to be better restrained and > regulated. > > > > --- Pat > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:35 PM, gepr <[email protected]> wrote: > >> FWIW, I'm very interested in your responses, being an ex-libertarian with >> both marxist and observationalist friends. >> >> On Dec 28, 2015 1:35 PM, "Patrick Reilly" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > I'm mainly worried that my educational session with Nick is boring >> everyone else. >> >> ============================================================ >> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv >> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College >> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com >> > > > > -- > The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and > confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) > named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby > notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of > this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies > of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, > please send an email to [email protected]. > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > -- The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an email to [email protected].
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
