Wow, that may become a new favorite expression: "save my breath to cool my
soup". Thanks for it.

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Pamela McCorduck <[email protected]> wrote:

> I haven’t heard the terms “thin problems” and “thick problems.” Are these
> yours, Patrick? They’re wonderfully intuitive: if I hadn’t heard the terms
> before, I still knew what you meant. Thanks.
>
> As for the techno-liberterians of Silicon Valley, it’s useless to remind
> them that they ride on a grand government investment of half a century ago,
> that none of them, individually, or collectively, would have made. But on
> this, I save my breath to cool my soup.
>
> Pamela
>
>
> On Dec 28, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Patrick Reilly <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Well, the main point I have (unless Nick's psychoanalysis of my thinly
> submitted aggressiveness is the real story) is that I believe that there
> are thin problems and thick problems, and that solvers of thin problems are
> overly regarded in Silicon Valley culture.
>
> Such captains of industry think that, if they could have coded Twitter,
> then they know all that they need to to address any discoverable problem
> after a day or two's investigation.  So the referenced article on the
> dilemma of Physics will be a valuable reference for me in suggesting that
> some problems are thick problems . . . and require extensive data-gathering.
>
> And yes, I am tired of hearing from techno-Libertarians that all political
> problems and privacy rights issues are easily solvable by merely limiting
> or hobbling government action.  Particularly when IMHO there are currently
> numerous private corporate entities that need to be better restrained and
> regulated.
>
>
>
> ---  Pat
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:35 PM, gepr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I'm very interested in your responses, being an ex-libertarian with
>> both marxist and observationalist friends.
>>
>> On Dec 28, 2015 1:35 PM, "Patrick Reilly" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm mainly worried that my educational session with Nick is boring
>> everyone else.
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
> confidential information.  It is intended only for the use of the person(s)
> named above. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are hereby
> notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
> of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly,
> please send an email to [email protected].
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to