Hi Marcus, 

 

Your answer is useful to me because it so exemplifies the paradox that Eric and 
I feel we are dealing with here.  Please see larding, below.  

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 8:37 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Subjectivity, intimacy, experience

 

“That set up has the benefit, among other things, of making the question you 
raise a clearly scientifically tractable issue. There should be no difference 
in how we go about trying to answer the question "what is iron" or "what is 
gorilla" or "what is the rate of sea level rise" and how we go about answering 
the question "what is hunger." 

[NST==>So, I take what follows to be an answer to this question, right?<==nst] 

 

Starve/feed an animal and watch what hormones are released and what axons 
fire.. A predictive model of detailed physiology that also predicts 
feeding/rest behavior and that maintains energy balance and generalizes across 
the species explains hunger.   Other outgoing connections from the hypothalamus 
to other areas are strings worth pulling, but if activity in those parts of the 
brain aren’t predictive of feeding behavior they are a result of hunger and not 
hunger itself.

[NST==>So, I take it that from this last sentence, in red, you would define 
hunger as a pattern of activity in the brain that is predictive of feeding 
behavior, right.  But not all feeding behavior, right?  Only feeding behavior 
that is preceded by deprivation?  What if you got feeding behavior that was not 
preceded by deprivation.  What if you got deprivation, and the rat never ate: 
--it just wandered around the food filled cage looking restless and unhappy.  
What if all your variables didn’t cluster as the concept “hunger” seems to 
demand?   

 

This is I think what Eric is driving at.  Before we begin research on the 
causes and correlates of “hunger”, we have a prior question of what hunger IS.  
By going to the physiological level immediately, we head that discussion off.  
Hunger is either, some sort of pattern of relation between food, food-related 
circumstances, etc., and food orientation, search, and consumption behavior, OR 
the cause of such a pattern.  It can’t be both, on pain of circularity. If 
hunger is the pattern, than the physiology is the cause of the pattern.  If the 
physiology is the cause, then we have to know of what systematic observation it 
is the effect.   Until we have established what those relationships are, we 
have nothing to explain, do we, except a rather vague concept derived from our 
own cultural notions of “hunger”?  There is a wonderful old example of hydra 
that consumes some other teensy creature for its nematocysts … little stinging 
cells that the hydra deploys on the outside of its body.  The hydra behaves 
exactly like a creature that has a “hunger” for nematocysts.  It attacks its 
nematocyst prey when it needs them, stops when it has “enough.”  But the 
nematocysts play no role in the metabolism of the hydra.  It captures other 
pray to feed in the ordinary sense.   Is this a hunger?  In many animals, the 
elements of prey orientation, search, chase, attack, immobilization, opening 
the prey, consumption and or storage, etc., don’t line up in the way that the 
vernacular concept of hunger demands.  

 

To return to humans, and self-perception, for a moment, one of the family of 
variables that would seem to need to cluster with deprivation, and food getting 
activity is what we behaviorists call “self-report” : in this case, the answer 
to the question, “Are you hungry?”  But like many self-report variables, hunger 
self-report measures do not necessarily cluster all that well with other 
presumptively measures of “hunger”, whatever we might decide it to be.  So, it 
becomes a real empirical question to ask what, in God’s name, the subject is 
speaking to when he answers the question, “Are you hungry?”. 

 

I am sorry if this answer is inadequate.  It’s certainly inadequately 
proofread.  I know I got myself into this, but everything else is suffering and 
I have to get myself out.  So forgive me if I now let it slide for a while. 

 

All the best, 

 

Nick 

 

<==nst] 

 

Marcus

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to