Nick asks: > How does thinking of data as > encased in a non-dynamic subterranean matrix shape our (your) thinking for > good > or ill?
I'm astounded that *that* is the (most) salient part of the metaphor to your mind. I'd sooner know, "how does talking of data as something that is susceptible not only to extraction but to BEING USED UP shape your BEHAVIOR for good or ill?" It occurs to me just now, typing, that the originators of the damned phrase might not have been thinking of mining coal (say), but rather of jewels or gold--in which case the product isn't used up, it is simply re-sequestered from its subterranean matrix to some other matrix; or maybe of ore, in which case some "useful" knowledge will be refined and used for probably private good or public ill, at--even more so than for coal, perhaps--enormous public expense in the form of mine tailings, cyanide-poisoned water supplies, etc., etc. You may not have noticed that I've always despised this metaphor. But I never did give it even this much (a couple of minutes) of thought, to see perhaps why. So thanks, I guess. ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
