David, 

 

Thanks for pitching in.  

 

I have some hazy data concerning bobolink song that might relate to your 
hypothesis.  We did two studies of bobolink song in relatively stable and 
relatively disrupted habitats.  At least that is what we thought was the 
relevant variable.  In the more stable environment, the song was hierarchically 
organized into strings of several songs that were widely shared between 
neighbors in the same field.  Not fractal, exactly, but definitely, 
multi-level.  In the more disrupted field, the songs were essentially random 
with no repeated long elements shared between neighbors.  

 

That’s all I got!

 

Nick 

 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Prof David West [mailto:profw...@fastmail.fm] 
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 10:54 AM
To: Nick Thompson <nickthomp...@earthlink.net>; Friam <Friam@redfish.com>; Kim 
Sorvig <sor...@cybermesa.com>
Cc: friam-ow...@redfish.com; alberto.ala...@ug.uchile.cl; Jenny Quillien 
<jquill...@cybermesa.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Fractal discussion Landscape-bird songs

 

Nick,

 

As asked (effect, affect impose?), my answer would be no. A partial test of the 
answer would be to see if the songs of birds living, even for multiple 
generations, in arguably non-fractal environments, e.g. mid-town Manhattan, 
lost their fractal nature. This test would not rule out the possibility that 
the 'evolution' of songs was isomorphic to the evolution of bird morphology AND 
isomorphic to an evolving fractal environment.

 

A different way to approach the question might be to ask if "fractality" is 
somehow a substrate upon which living things rely in order to be recognized as 
"alive." Two things lead me to ask the question in this manner. First, fractal 
geometry is used to generate digital landscapes and digital life forms, e.g. 
trees, with results that are far more "lifelike" than attempts based on other 
graphical systems — Ed Angel should enlighten us here because it is his area of 
expertise, not mine.

 

Second, you have hear me talk of Christopher Alexander and his search for the 
Nature of Order. He posits fifteen properties (e.g. centers, boundaries, 
alternating repetition, contrast, deep interlock and ambiguity, etc.) that, he 
says, are fundamental and essential to the creation of built environments that 
have "liveness." It has always seemed to me that the compositions created using 
these fifteen properties would also be, in some manner, fractal.

 

Jenny might have ideas as to the second reason, but she is in Amsterdam for six 
weeks preparatory to a move there in the fall and might not see the question on 
the list. I have asked Richard Gabriel for an answer in his role as another 
expert on Alexander.

 

davew

 

 

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017, at 03:57 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:

Helloooo, List,

 

I would like to introduce to you Alberto Alaniz (who describes himself in the 
communication below).  I “met” him on Research Gate when he downloaded a paper 
of mine on the structural organization of bird song.  I noticed that he was 
writing from a Landscape Department, and I thought, “A landscape person who is 
interested in birdsong! He must be interested in fractals!”  And I was right.  
So please welcome him.  Steve please note?

 

The idea of his that I particularly want to hear you discuss is his notion that 
fractality (is that a word?) in one domain can effect, affect, impose? 
fractality in another.  So is there a relationship between the fractality which 
my research revealed in the organization of bird song and the fractality of the 
landscapes on which bird behavior is deployed. 

 

I particularly wonder what Kim  Sorvig and Jenny Quillen and ProfDave think 
about this, but also wonder if others on the list could put an oar in.

 

Thanks,

 

Nick

 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Alberto Jose Alaniz [mailto:alberto.ala...@ug.uchile.cl] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 2:21 PM
To: nthomp...@clarku.edu <mailto:nthomp...@clarku.edu> 
Subject: Fractal discussion Landscape-bird songs

 

Dear Nick

 

I apreciate so much your invitation, so i really intrested in participate of 
your discussion group. I am a young researcher finishing my MS, and this types 
of oportunities look very good for my, specially if i can interact with other 
scientics. About your question, of course you can share my oppinion, now if you 
want i can writte a compleate opinion in extenso, and i will send to you 
tomorrow in the afternon.

 

My field of study is the ecologial modelling and the conservation biology, the 
last year i published my firsts papers in Biological conservation and 
International Journal of Epidemiology, the first one about ecosystem 
conservation and the secondth is a global model of exposure risk to Zika virus. 
Currently im working in ecosystems and in assessment of habitat loss in forest 
specialist species (with Kathryn Sieving from University of Florida).

 

Alberto  Alaniz Baeza

Lic. en Geografía, Geógrafo & Magíster (c) Áreas Silvestres y Conservación

Becario, Laboratorio de Ecología de Ambientes Fragmentados

Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas Animales, U. de Chile

Investigador, Laboratorio de Ecología de Ecosistemas

Departamento de Recursos Naturales Renovables, U. de Chile

Académico, Centro de Formación Técnica del Medio Ambiente IDMA

+56996097443

https://albertoalaniz.wordpress.com/

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to