>From BBC a reasonable summary: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40879485
My question is simple: what *are* the alternatives? Is there an interesting game theoretic analysis? The toughest part is that South Korea is being held hostage. NK can devastate SK even if hit with a pre-emptive strike. As rash as Trump's bluster has been, the real question remains: what is the reasonable response to NK's threat. - Preemptive Strike? Likely a loser unless it is so massive as to obliterate every human in NK. SK would be seriously damaged in the aftermath. - Wait 'til NK strikes? Again, hardly reasonable. - Anti-missile defense? Possibly, but you just gotta miss one for apocalypse. And what do you do if you *do* succeed? SK is still hostage. - Tit for Tat? Well, only in the bluster game. Our threats will match yours & vice versa. Has anyone heard of an interesting strategy? -- Owen
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
