Glen -

I'm definitely not the one to educate you (or anyone) on this. Following your allusion to Szaszian anti-psychology, what I'm seeking is common ground on whether there is even a valid question which the ideas of cultural evolution and more pointedly, memetics purports to answer (or "structure usefully" perhaps in your terms?).

I'm intuitive at my root, so if a set of heuristics, metaphors, rules-of-thumb, semi-formal analogies, notional models, seem to be failing in some significant way, I am happy to back off to a more fundamental level and seek fresh experiential bedrock to rebuild my house of cards upon.

May I ask how you DO structure your thinking around the *apparent* (or is this an illusion) structured "progress" of human knowledge/behaviour/culture/society/civilization??? Naturally many see our current state on the brink of (apparently) climate disaster, collapse of capitalism, fizzling out of representative democracy, possibility of a (regional?) nuclear exchange, etc. as evidence that "we have not evolved!", but I would claim that is a gross misapprehension of the term "evolved". I'd say we HAVE evolved to the state we are in (collectively).

For the sake of discussion, I'm happy to drop the attempt of the term "meme" to be a strong analogy to a "gene", but I'm guessing that is not enough to help you with the specifics of your skepticism? I'm poking AT the perimeters of your skepticism NOT to pry it off of you, but rather to understand if there is something specifically useful (to me) in that crust for my own skepticism (or even my pollyanna).

- Sieve


On 8/13/17 12:17 PM, gepr ⛧ wrote:
Well like I said in response to Frank's suggestion about self psychology, I 
tend towards a Szaszian perspective on talk therapy and psychology. But even 
that constellation of ideas, I think, has more structural truth to it than 
memetics.

Of course my ignorance may be getting in my way here. So I'm relatively open to 
being educated on any of these subjects. But there is a pretty high skeptical 
hurdle that I have to leap over in order for any such education to take root.


On August 13, 2017 9:56:16 AM PDT, Steven A Smith <sasm...@swcp.com> wrote:
Is there an alternate way of thinking/talking about the *apparent*
encoding of human/social/cultural artifacts in language units,
including
what appears to be something a lot like "mutation and drift" across
this
space?

Or have I already (re)transgressed?


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to