This is a good horse.  Let's keep it alive.  

 

Alas, Glen, the link didn't work.   Can you resend it, if it is crucial to my 
understanding what you wrote. 

 

Meantime, I offer the following for you all to stew on: 

 

And I have known the arms already, known them all—

Arms that are braceleted and white and bare

(But in the lamplight, downed with light brown hair!)

Is it perfume from a dress

That makes me so digress?

Arms that lie along a table, or wrap about a shawl.

               And should I then presume?

               And how should I begin?

 

Shall I say, I have gone at dusk through narrow streets

And watched the smoke that rises from the pipes

Of lonely men in shirt-sleeves, leaning out of windows? ...

 

I should have been a pair of ragged claws

Scuttling across the floors of silent seas.. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ? u???
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 9:06 AM
To: FriAM <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] the pseudoscience of evolutionary psychology?

 

Since the horse isn't quite dead:

 

 

Women must have the right to bare their arms without comment

 
<https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/19/women-right-bare-arms-canada-prime-minister-kim-campbell>
 
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/19/women-right-bare-arms-canada-prime-minister-kim-campbell

 

"I look at that photo now and see someone who was actually really shy and 
uncomfortable in the public eye, the opposite of a “look-at-me” beauty queen."

 

 

On 02/15/2018 08:44 AM, uǝlƃ ☣ wrote:

> Exactly!  So, it seems most reasonable to assume that the style of the 
> clothing one wears to an awards ceremony, including how much skin is exposed, 
> has more to do with cultural and clique norms than a "desire to be desired", 
> whatever that may mean.

> 

> On 02/15/2018 08:16 AM, Frank Wimberly wrote:

>> It's probably true that there are as many idiosyncratic motives as there are 
>> people.  But I believe that there are dominant themes in that set of 
>> motives.  Which begs the question how you know what someone's motives are, 
>> including yourself.

> 

 

--

∄ uǝʃƃ

 

============================================================

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe  
<http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com> 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC  <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> 
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to