OK. I'm down with taking on risk for (whatever) reason. But the question in this thread is about whether or not one knows the type of risk prior to choosing it. Classifying risk is exactly the problem of classifying problems. If you don't understand the type of risk you're taking on, then are you (actually) taking on risk? Or are you just a moron walking around in a space you don't understand? And is there a difference? Maybe we're all morons walking around in spaces we don't understand. I'm also down with that conclusion.
On 3/7/19 2:49 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > What crime? I'm actually advocating purposeful collectivism. Taking on > risk -- walking away from the campfire -- for the sake of increasing entropy. > A few of the attached Borg meet their end in doing so.
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
