There are security issues and there are non-security issues. When it comes to plausible risk scenarios, one can invest in a common pool and as opposed to another specialized pool. A ballerina that knows how to handle a gun, say.
On 3/7/19, 2:42 PM, "Friam on behalf of glen ∅" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: I'm not convinced. If such a Lyft customer suffered a breakdown from Santa Fe to Tesuque at, say, noon in the summer, one might make an argument that it would be good for that Lyft customer to know something about how the car works ... at least well enough to know whether the driver was snowing him on this or that explanation of what was happening. The consideration of edge cases are often decent heuristics for approximating complete security. On 3/7/19 11:23 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > > < As Steve tried to point out with the "form leads/follows function" and his talk about a well-stated problem, in order to delegate, say, "fix my car", I have to know that the car is the problem. If, for example, the real problem is that I don't know how to drive the car, there's nothing the mechanic will be able to do to "fix it" because the car's not the problem. > > > For example, a young person that would not consider purchasing a car because there is Lyft would have no need to delegate this problem. ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
