But, again, you're adding judgment and evaluative capabilities that seem to require some kind of understanding of the components involved. How would a car-ignorant person know that a Lyft ride from Santa Fe to Tesuque might involve some risk of, say, dying of exposure? We can assume they'd have some cultural/traditional experience that most Lyft cars are relatively new and clean. (Or that ballerinas don't typically hang out where guns are needed.) And that might bridge the boundary between a [non]security issue. But, again, this is not "to relate". It's to solve a particular problem, whether or not that problem was implicitly solved by infrastructure (aka cultural tendencies).
On 3/7/19 1:46 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > There are security issues and there are non-security issues. When it comes > to plausible risk scenarios, one can invest in a common pool and as opposed > to another specialized pool. A ballerina that knows how to handle a gun, > say.
pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
