It's not clear to me which of these Marcus was responding to. But it seems like he was responding to (1) with the variation as a function of changes in perspective. But your teasing with (2) seems likely, too, from which I infer that our world-cutters are dynamic and can be complexified depending on whatever feedback mechanisms they're dependent on.
I don't quite grok how (3) applies, I guess. My understanding of abduction (whatever it actually means) has done the most for me regarding how to handle outliers of any kind. Anomalies can never be ignored. If one's world-cutting seems persistent, my preference is to assume that it's motivated reasoning and the consistency is artificial. On 7/26/19 8:53 AM, Steven A Smith wrote:
1. Stick and Stones ... 2. Passive-Aggressive modes/roles in Kolmogorov Models 3. Outlier identification within Persistent Homologies
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
