Glen writes:

< But then he goes toward monism-by-unification with "agreeing on what matters" 
and whole-equilibrium-implies-part-equilibrium. >

The context was Steve's query about whether I think that multi-objective 
optimization is better than single-objective optimization.   That's not monism, 
it's a high dimensional Pareto curve where some variables are weighted as less 
important than others.   Lack of internal consistency or lack of evidence could 
be  reasons to weight them down.  That's not how it works in the idiocracy, of 
course.

< I really like the idea that we need such things because we're resource and 
inference-style constrained computational devices ... as I imagine someone like 
David Wolpert might argue. But why can't the types over which one infers and 
one's inference style be dynamically context-sensitive such that practically, 
methodologically, deep pluralism is a more accurate way to model what it is 
_we_ are? Why is that sort of thing so repellent? >

In a recent Handmaid's episode June asks Eleanor (who has severe mental health 
problems and a husband that is a war criminal) if she’s ever considered leaving 
Gilead.  Eleanor responds “You mean somewhere where I can get mood stabilizers 
instead of herbal tea?”   Besides the implications of pluralism on practical 
governance, there's the issue of overfitting.   If every situation can be 
explained by an unlimited number of parameters, it is never really modeled but 
just memorized.   What insane thing do I have to do to survive another day in 
Gilead?   Many handmaids lose their mind and do just that -- not just obey, but 
internalize the coercion as a good thing.   It occurs to me that a valuable 
ability of adulthood (at least in the US) is be at ease with insincerity.  In 
my mind it is the same thing as turning off the unification engine.   

Marcus


 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to