Glen, 

There is a LOT in your messages that I like, agree with, and/or want to think 
more about before I respond.  First, tho, let me clarify my position.  

I stipulate that IF the experiences produced by psychedelics are sciencible, 
then they are science.  What we call "SCIENCE"  is just a formalization and 
distillation of broader patterns of analysis and exploration that have proven 
to be more  successful, "i.e., science".  It is that broader pattern for which 
I claim privilege.   If there are patterns in experience, then this is the way 
to find them.  If this is NOT the way to find patterns in experience, then it 
is not science.  To the extent that the prejudices and practices of any group 
of scientists, myself included, are inconsistent with science, as understood 
above, they are probably NOT science, no matter who should claim otherwise.  

I hope that you stipulate that the kind of verbal analysis and metaphorical 
"play" that we have been engaging in during this discussion is a PART of what 
people do when they do good science.  For my part, I stipulate that to pursue 
these activities to the exclusion of gathering data, either directly or 
indirectly, is to fetishize  philosophy and make a mockery of science.  Bit -- 
to allow myself a bit of agism-- it's what old people can do, or, perhaps, less 
grandiosely, it's what I can do right now.  And as long as I am tied to a 
community of inquiry -- that would be the rest of you, right -- I feel that I 
am pursuing science while doing it.  To the extent that I have fended off 
empirical data, I am a bad old bugger and should be horsewhipped.  In my 
defense, however, before you horsewhip me, let me say that I have tried to get 
clear, before I process the data on what happens when I take drugs, on the 
question of how that information is going to be worked into our scientific 
discussion, given that I perceive that there is some risk involved. 

On another matter, Glen, how are you doing with, what ate you doing about, the 
covid19?. A couple of weeks ago,  I tried to get my wife to pack up and make a 
run for the pristine isolation of the Mosquito Infested Swamp, pleading great 
age and prior conditions.  Nothin' doin'.  So, now, I think, we are stuck.  I 
can think of worse places to be stuck than santa fe, but I hate feeling stuck, 
even in paradise.  

Nick

Nick 


Nicholas Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
Clark University
[email protected]
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of u?l? ?
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 8:18 AM
To: FriAM <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Pragmaticism and puritanism

Well, I definitely privilege scientific ways of knowing more than any other way 
of knowing [†]. So I don't disagree with what you *say*. But it seems to me 
that *you* don't privilege scientific knowledge in these discussions. You talk 
a LOT about philosophy and metaphysics, but not much about scientific results. 
The recent 'round and 'round about "sledgehammers", Peirce's metaphysics, or 
whatnot, largely ignoring any attempts to discuss psychedelic research and 
medicine, seems to imply that you do not privilege science.

So, maybe if I pull out the old saw again?  If results published in 
peer-reviewed literature and clinical trial data will NOT convince you that 
psychedelics can be used as medicine, then what WOULD convince you? If nothing 
will ever convince you, then you certainly do NOT privilege science.


[†] It ain't perfect; and it ain't the only kind of knowledge. But it's the 
best we have.

On 3/10/20 11:03 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> No, I am not sure that Dave and Glen would disagree with any of this.

--
☣ uǝlƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to