What troubles me in all this is the (coarse) granularity. Whole state 
stay-at-home orders deny the reality that many states are diverse, 
geographically, demographically, etc. But I suppose it's par for the course 
because our coarse grain misgovernance shows up everywhere, not only in the 
response to this crisis, but in voting, in-network healthcare, Walmart/Amazon 
logistics, ... hell even in the remote diagnosis of Trump's mental disorders 
<https://www.salon.com/2020/04/08/yale-psychiatrist-bandy-lee-trumps-deadly-briefings-display-anti-human-psychology/>
 by non-experts.

Steve's ideas around clique-specific methods are attractive, but ultimately 
infeasible because we will *never* have enough fine-grained information to make 
such methods data-driven. And even if we did, I think 2 fundamental conditions 
would obtain: 1) celebrity expert-deniers like Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, and 
Gwyneth Paltrow would be gravity wells for the attention of us lazy normals 
and/or 2) something like gerrymandering, where the specific methods would be 
too complicated for us couch potatoes to follow.

Contrast hypothetical proposals for such network-specific methods against the 
tight, universal, semantic grounding of "don't shake hands" and "stay home". My 
guess is a full dictatorial clamp down will be effective precisely because it 
leaves no finagle room for (1) or (2). There's no room for dithering between 
"experts" or the artificial seizure of expertise by non-experts (like George 
Conway). And the reason the US will suffer in practice, despite the theoretical 
and "anti-human" benefits of a diverse response, is because we're a Federal 
system.

However, a story from the radio or somesuch the other day seems to contradict 
me. (I was exercising and couldn't pay close enough attention.) I heard someone 
*assert* that Germany is fairing, practically, so well against the virus 
*because* it's federated. I can't find a link to that or similar stories. So, I 
can't tell if they're just post-hoc rationalizing or have some data to show 
it's the federated decoupling that's causative.

On 4/7/20 10:52 PM, David Eric Smith wrote:
> All that said, the clamp-down was impressive, and probably fairly effective.  
> Not a gold standard like Taiwan, but better than any of the major countries 
> in the west, and with a much larger population.


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

..-. . . -.. / - .... . / -- --- .-. .-.. --- -.-. -.- ... / . .-.. --- ..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to