Hm. Well, I've been talking about hidden states the whole time. So, I suppose you're simply not talking to me, despite having mentioned things I've said and using my name in some posts. I'll bow out.
On 5/10/20 1:44 PM, Eric Charles wrote: > I offered the dead-duck vs the live-duck and Weekend at Bernie's as examples > of movement that is not behavior. We can also talk about avalanches, the > babbling brook, the explosion of the tree struck by lightening, the clouds > blowing through the sky. The vast, vast, vast, vast, vast majority of > movement that occurs in the universe in not behavior. > > Also, I am exactly not talking about hidden states. We could talk about that > at some point, for sure, but I wasn't talking about it before. I'm not sure > what I might have said that lead you to think anything "hidden" was at issue. > Certainly there are physically-internal states when we discuss organisms, but > my exact point is that the phenomenon in question do not exist at that level > of analysis. Back to Holt: -- ☣ uǝlƃ .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... . ... FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
