Jon writes:


“Especially interesting in Bret's story is the uncoverings/speculations

around corruption which does/can exist in the peer-review process.

Contrast this with the tremendously naive, and much more nationally

syndicated, perspective of the new Daily Show host, Trevor Noah.

Here he is arguing that "People shouldn't be able to put out studies

before they've been verified". Before this statement and after he

makes some ambiguous gestures at the necessity of peer-review in

the truth making process.“

There was an article posted by Eric a few weeks ago that turned out to be very 
controversial once it made it to major newspapers.   The Atlantic, for example, 
made similar remarks on the importance of peer review.   From my perspective, 
that article was like many of the papers from the authors.   It might have had 
a bit more rhetoric than needed, but overall it seemed to me to raise public 
health concerns that certainly should be considered as possibilities by 
officials and all people.   If there is worry that people will panic when faced 
with potentially bad news, well, maybe people need to become more robust to 
ambiguity.   For the most part in biology, results are trends and not 
black-and-white contrasts.   It doesn’t help in a crisis to hold back 
investigations just because a few premises aren’t fully evidenced.   Instead, 
seek to get more evidence *and* think about interventions if the expected 
outcome is severe enough.

Like with Trump, the problem is not that Science™ is so grandiose and arrogant, 
the problems is with impatient, ignorant people and their authoritarian 
personalities that seek out leaders, whether political or scientific, that will 
offer false dichotomies rather than admitting that they are not sure what to do 
or what will happen.  It seems to me doctors wear white coats because people 
seek-out and are comforted by authority.  Perhaps that is why so many female 
leaders were more adaptive to the pandemic.   When confidence couldn’t be 
provided, at least they could talk about it and make vulnerability be ok.

Marcus
-- --- .-. . .-.. --- -.-. -.- ... -..-. .- .-. . -..-. - .... . -..-. . ... 
... . -. - .. .- .-.. -..-. .-- --- .-. -.- . .-. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to