IDK. "Manifest" is an awkward word. I think it's normally used akin to epiphenomena, which would not then constrain the things that generated it. But there's an efficacy about "manifest" that you don't get with other concepts. And effective things change the universe such that anything that happens after that must then be different. I.e. the Nth iteration should be somehow different from the (N-1)th iteration because the world is new. So, if that's what they meant by "manifestation", then yes it works for me. But if they simply mean "phenotypic exhibition" or "phenotypic indicator", then no. I wouldn't consider that a phen-gen map.
On 7/17/20 4:32 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote: > In a project I was working on in the 70s we said that we were trying to > identify phenotypic manifestations of a genetic predisposition to develop > schizophrenia. Does that work for you? -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
