That's an unjustified assertion. There's plenty of evidence that our CNS *simulates* the world and reuses components in both interacting with the world and simulating the world. Your dualism will not be tolerated. >8^D
There's a branch of xAI where the black boxes are "explained" dualistically with a white box analog that simulates the black box and something like the A/R ε-equivalence is used to build trust/credibility in the fidelity of that simulation. But they don't hot-swap components with each other, which is why (I think) such methods are ultimately less credible than types of xAI where the system that explains IS the system that executes. On 11/11/20 9:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Isn’t this a wonderful example of the incoherence of a notion of executive > consciousness? > > The system that explains is not the system that executes. -- glen ep ropella 971-599-3737 - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
