> I think the thread-bending horse left the barn a decade ago. Even Owen could > bend a thread or two in his time. . > > N
NLT- If I believed that literally and were (more) obtuse than I am I might start removing Subject lines entirely. I do not believe they are superflous and depend on my own (weak but still operating) associative memory to glean something from thread:author:sequence triples when I try to decide what to (re)read thoroughly or to refer back to after someone makes a previously uninteresting/relevant (to me) thread interesting/relevant. I don't know when I became an "old dog" but I find myself avoiding/resisting "new tricks" like the ones the Morlocks provide (e.g. nabble) and Glen points us at from time to time (e.g SMMRY https://smmry.com/). FWIW I just gandered (you can verbize any noun?) nabble:FriAM and realized the last column provides a "score" or "roster" of who has had the "last word" in a given thread, for better or worse. - SAS - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
