Exactly. So what are you disagreeing with? What we call "free will" is a possibly deterministic self-perceptive feedback.
On 4/2/21 11:05 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > Not magic. We can still reason about what a recursive or even probabilistic > recursive function must do. We can reason about intertwined functions, or, > even functions with entangled states if meat bags had such things. I can > imagine implementing an executive process for a robot that would result in > something one might call agency. This all works fine within the bounds of > purely deterministic things. It is just another computer program. -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
