What constitutes an “understanding”? To truly understand a system one must manipulate it and make it do different things. A model is only as good as experience. And frankly our species is getting a little long in the tooth, anyway.
From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Merle Lefkoff Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 11:16 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Drones to detect wildfires Thanks for the definition. When it comes to regenerative agriculture and forestry, there is no human creation of "new biological parts" or "redesign" in a technological sense. It's about just stopping what we're doing now which is making things worse, and joining nature in supporting its ability to heal itself after human assault. I agree not enough mind-sets have changed yet from routinely referencing our present industrial civilization's need to control, repare, manipulate --to understanding a different way of living on Earth so our species might survive. At the same time, there are those (mostly young) who are part of a growing understanding of how to discovder a (perhaps former) sustainable relationship with our living systems. On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:54 AM Pieter Steenekamp <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: from wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_biology Synthetic biology (SynBio) is a multidisciplinary area of research that seeks to create new biological parts, devices, and systems, or to redesign systems that are already found in nature. It is a branch of science that encompasses a broad range of methodologies from various disciplines, such as biotechnology<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biotechnology>, genetic engineering<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_engineering>, molecular biology<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_biology>, molecular engineering<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_engineering>, systems biology<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_biology>, membrane science<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_lipid_bilayer>, biophysics<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biophysics>, chemical and biological engineering<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_engineering>, electrical and computer engineering<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_engineering>, control engineering<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_engineering> and evolutionary biology<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_biology>. Due to more powerful genetic engineering<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_engineering> capabilities and decreased DNA synthesis and sequencing costs<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_sequencing>, the field of synthetic biology is rapidly growing. In 2016, more than 350 companies across 40 countries were actively engaged in synthetic biology applications; all these companies had an estimated net worth of $3.9 billion in the global market.[1]<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_biology#cite_note-1> On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 19:49, Merle Lefkoff <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Marcus, I don't understand your term "synthetic biology." On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:24 AM Marcus Daniels <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: So we move from chemical engineering to synthetic biology. There will always be mistakes. From: Friam <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Merle Lefkoff Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 10:05 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Drones to detect wildfires Marcus, we've been "experimenting" with our terrestrial biome for at least 10-12,000 years (when the first spade hit the ground). The time for more experiments is over....unless they are experiments that help us understand even more deeply how to restore the Mycelium networks so that the fungi can solve our climate change challenge. This is perhaps the most important task that will save us from extinction. See Merlin Sheldrake's book, "Entangled Life" for explanation. On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:41 AM Marcus Daniels <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We won’t realize anything unless the experiments happen. We may not learn from experiments, but that is a different issue than the need for the experiments. From: Friam <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 7:46 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Drones to detect wildfires My father dedicated his life to "forest management" as a professional forester, trained in biology and range/timber management. He retired "early" after 30 years somewhat in disgust over the changing of aesthetics and perspectives of the United States Forest Service. He was dedicated and loyal to the spirit of Aldo Leopold and other early conservationists. He spent multiple multi-week segments every summer leading (most Zuni and Hopi native) fire-crews on the West Coast trying ot protec homes and "valuable timber". We lived on the edge of the first Wilderness (Gila) created (at the behest of Aldo Leopold) for 2/3 of my growing up years. My father died 10 years ago (Alzheimers), was cremated, and we (illegall) spread his cremains in the heart of the Gila with a minor amount of guilt as he was a (nearly) strict rule follower (yet asked for this). Within the year, a serious wildfire complex converged at almost the exact spot we scattered him (woooOoooooo!). Even my Trump-voting (2016) sister and husband are now acknowledging that his life/profession were dedicated to a project that was fundamentally "unwise". They *were* (for the most part) doing the best they knew how. Most everything they did (from stopping wildfires at the first opportunity) to running dual bulldozers across landscapes with a chain between them to clear the juniper trees from a landscape to allow more grass (for cattle) to grow was "well intended", but it was *range* and *timber* management not "grassland" and "forest" management as they called it. The goal was to maximize the "productivity" of the public lands under their management (dept of Agriculture_. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM dept of Interior) was know to be *worse* in the sense that their rules on cattle and mining were much less careful of protecting the landscape and biome. The National Parks were derided by both the Forest Service and the BLM for being "much too restrictive" (no "harvesting of resources"!!!!) And yet NOW we realize how "unwise" all of that was. But in the same breath we suggest that all of our exploitative depradations of the planet's "resources" are necessary and possibly "a really good thing"... and I am sure that in another 20 or 50 years we will be lamenting *all* of the things that today we are promoting wholeheartedly in the name of "progress". This is part of how I became a neo-Luddite. - Steve On 5/25/21 2:50 AM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote: Let's hope they are a bit more wise in managing the wildfires in the future than they were in the 20th century. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/14/california-fire-suppression-forests-tinderbox Before this unprecedented era of mega-blazes on the US west coast, California’s forests had a canny, ingenious way of avoiding destructive worst-case forest fire scenarios. By periodically removing the grasses, shrubs and young trees – known as the forest understory – California<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/california> avoided fires growing to destructive intensities before the 20th century. The way this was done? Fire. Every five to 15 years, groundfires would burn through the forest, killing off the undergrowth on a regular basis, thus removing the material that can act as tinder and kindle fires. Such groundfires were sparked by lightning or by indigenous people who used sophisticated burning practices to facilitate crop growing and hunting. Because the fires occurred frequently, the understory rarely had time to build up enough combustible material for the fires to reach the canopies of the mature trees – which is what causes the large, devastating fires we are seeing now. As a result, overstory trees might get wounded by the groundfires, but they would rarely get killed. On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 10:22, Jochen Fromm <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Due to climate change there will be more and more wildfires in California, Arizona and New Mexico in the coming years. Drones could help to detect wildfires early. https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/sensors/remote-sensing/drones-sensors-wildfire-detection -J. - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ -- Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D. Center for Emergent Diplomacy emergentdiplomacy.org<http://emergentdiplomacy.org> Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA mobile: (303) 859-5609 skype: merle.lelfkoff2 twitter: @merle110 - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ -- Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D. Center for Emergent Diplomacy emergentdiplomacy.org<http://emergentdiplomacy.org> Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA mobile: (303) 859-5609 skype: merle.lelfkoff2 twitter: @merle110 - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ -- Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D. Center for Emergent Diplomacy emergentdiplomacy.org<http://emergentdiplomacy.org> Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA mobile: (303) 859-5609 skype: merle.lelfkoff2 twitter: @merle110
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
