Yeah, OK. I agree. As with the FinTech payment plan band-aid I posted, our nudges can, at least, demonstrate some good faith attempts to "do good". But I'd like it better if we were more aggressive in our attempts ... aim high so that when you inevitably fail, you'll end up slightly higher than you would've if you'd aimed low. But I doubt focusing on profitability is the way to aim high. The space of profitable enterprises is *heavily* biased to the low hanging fruit. As Eric pointed out awhile back, the majority of high impact innovation is launched via non-profit efforts. In that perspective, profit limits high impact innovation by diverting resources to low impact innovation.
On 5/26/21 8:59 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > To clarify, by "remediate" I mean that some consequences are created (e.g. a > pandemic, harm to the biosphere), and then there is a problem to solve. > Pfizer is a remediator. > Ford is a potential remediator with the F-150 lightening, solar panel > manufacturers are remediators, Impossible Burger is a remediator, etc. Yes, > I recognize some will debate whether some of these are really remediators. > Nothing short of sitting around watching fungus grow will satisfy these > people. -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
