Emergency responders have hard constraints.   Dozers and crews need to be moved 
into place.  Aircraft need fuel and access to water or fire retardant.    Crew 
need meals and can only function and survive within certain temperature ranges. 
  The objectives themselves have a political dimension:  Save multi-million 
dollar properties vs. public forests vs. native lands.   In this sense the 
objectives are fuzzy and the whole firefighting effort itself depends on a 
significant extent to predicting weather conditions accurately.  Some of those 
weather conditions are even created by a fire.   

One can cast the constraints as coarse energy levels, but that may wash out the 
ill-defined objective entirely.

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 10:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FRIAM] heuristics for fuzzy objectives (was Re: Drones to detect 
wildfires)

Another context in which a *softening* of objectives, or perhaps 
multi-objective orientation, might help:

Safety Third
https://www.jems.com/operations/safety-is-third-not-first-and-we-all-know-it-should-be/

This context does a better job of highlighting the point that objective-less 
wandering is *not* unequivocally better than [multi-]objective optimization. Of 
course, Stanley glosses this in his comments about "modest" objectives. Perhaps 
we could reframe the idea that an emergency responder's desire to both help 
someone and not be injured in the process is a "modest" [set of] objective[s]? 
But it should be easy to see why that's dodgy rhetoric. Staying alive while 
helping people is "modest"? Really?

The "safety first" mantra is not, unlike the strawman set forth in this 
article, a hard *ordering* of priorities. The mantra is an attempt to get the 
individual to think dynamically, adaptively. We know your dopamine-fueled 
risk-taking personality will *cause* you to leap into the fray before engaging 
your conscious mind. So our (perhaps flawed) attempt, here, is to encourage you 
to keep your conscious mind engaged and *balance* all the rational priorities 
you know apply.

Stanley's rhetoric was hyperbolic if applied literally, especially to 
situations in the middle of the spectrum between "modest" and "ambitious". But 
given the uphill battle, it was useful hyperbole. It was a great shock-jock 
technique. An "analog" to clickbait. Hook 'em quick. But 5-6 years after peak 
rhetoric, we should be able to couch it in a reasonable spectrum. Heuristics 
for when to formulate and solve for crisp objectives versus when to *play* 
versus a mix of both seem more interesting at this point.


On 5/28/21 10:06 AM, Steve Smith wrote:
> The most fundamental problem with the general idea of setting objectives and 
> then using any number of clever methods to converge on those objectives is 
> that *at best* they are only as good as the objectives themselves.   The 
> point being made here, of reducing the granularity to a pieceweiz, forward 
> chaining is well motivated IMO, as it seems the "best we know how to do".
> 
> In the spirit of "exaptation", and "life is what happens while you are making 
> other plans",  the point of picking an objective and searching for it on an 
> exotic, high dimensional (even fractal) landscape is to provide a heuristic 
> for *exploring* the parts of the landscape you can't even imagine much less 
> predict exists.   I would compare it more to "creative wandering" than 
> "active seeking", though I think the two can be compatible.
> 
>     /“It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the 
> journey that matters, in the end.”///
> 
>         ― Ursula K. Le Guin, The Left Hand of Darkness 
> <https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes/817527>

--
☤>$ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to