There was a time in the 8th century in the Islamic Golden Age when Baghdad was 
the center of the scientific world during the Abbasid Caliphate. For science to 
prosper there must be a culture which values knowledge and 
freedom.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbasid_CaliphateKnowledge is based on 
language and stored in books. In Baghdad there was at the time a "house of 
wisdom", a mix between library and university 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_WisdomThe scholars used a form of 
dialectic debate called "kalam", which is a bit similar to the Jewish method of 
hevruta/havruta in which a small group of students discuss and debate a shared 
texthttps://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/sep/26/baghdad-centre-of-scientific-world-J.
-------- Original message --------From: [email protected] Date: 9/25/21  
20:23  (GMT+01:00) To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' 
<[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: [FRIAM] 
Islam-Science-Muslims-and-Technology-Seyyed-Hossein-Nasr-in-Conversation-with-Muzaffar-Iqbal-2009.pdf
 Dear Colleagues,  Because of an interest some of you expressed in Islamic 
science, I ran down the text linked below.  It is an entire book, and I have 
read only the first chapter, but I found that fascinating.  It is a sort of 
airing of linen concerning the role of science in the modern Islamic world that 
tracks in  interesting ways the recent American ambivalence about science.   
This first chapter is both unsettling and very familiar at the same time.  
http://traditionalhikma.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Islam-Science-Muslims-and-Technology-Seyyed-Hossein-Nasr-in-Conversation-with-Muzaffar-Iqbal-2009.pdfOk,
 just to give you sense of one of the places it leaves me:  If the fault of 
western science is that it is laced with  unacknowledged western values, what 
would a science that acknowledged its values look like.  I have argued that the 
science we practice is absurdly dualistic (given that we have only one source 
of information).  But it is unclear to me how “dualism” is a value.  Is the 
“rape of nature” and all that follows implicit in dualism?  I wish I could 
claim that if I turn you all into monists, you will all become wind=turbine 
fanatics, but I don’t think that’s the case.   Do values guide what we do or 
are they just the heavy artillery that we muster to convince others to do what 
we have done?  See what you think? Nick 
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to