How is it epi? In both the SLAPP case and the SB8 case, it's a directly targeted effect. And it has a long history in prior things like informal policies for segregation and other law-gaming. There's no "epi" here.
And what's with that Wikipedia link? Were you trying to edit the page but your auth attempt failed? On 11/11/21 8:02 AM, Jon Zingale wrote: > "Chilling Effect", now that's good epiphenomena. By that, I suppose I > mean that "chilling effect" is more general than a simple gag or > restraining order, it aims to inhibit or dissuade behavior. The content > of chilling seems to live in the question of "why should a legal system > dissuade or inhibit legal actions"? My first impression is that such a > need arises in any legal system that is ultimately too rigid and unwieldy > (or too ill-founded) to rigorously target the subject of its domain. So, > probably, every non-trivial legal system. > > On the one hand, "chilling" seems a natural choice for better fitting > the letter of the law to its "spirit", but doing so also creates a lever > connecting goals to functions (a la' Charles and Thompson): > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilling_effect#:~:text=13%5D%5Bfailed%20verification%5D-,Chilling%20effects%20on%20Wikipedia%20users,-%5Bedit%5D > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilling_effect#:~:text=13%5D%5Bfailed%20verification%5D-,Chilling%20effects%20on%20Wikipedia%20users,-%5Bedit%5D> -- "Better to be slapped with the truth than kissed with a lie." ☤>$ uǝlƃ .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
