""" How is it epi? In both the SLAPP case and the SB8 case, it's a directly targeted effect. """
I can see that I was being too clumsy. In the SLAPP case and the SB8 case chilling is pretty straightforward, but in the case I linked[☃] (which jumps to a highlighted section "Chilling effects on Wikipedia users" on the Wikipedia page for *chilling effect*) I see an example where I don't believe that Wikipedia, Snowden, nor the NSA had any investment in chilling out Wikipedia users. Instead, it seems more like a novel side effect, a consequence of the subject matter, many citizens perceptions of their government, and a revelation of information. So I suppose like anything, things may have side effects, and I am not sure it contributes anything to mention it. Comparing "Wikipedia Foundation versus NSA" with the *Clear Channel memorandum*[♪] is interesting to me (a sarcastic thanks again to the Telecomm act[⏚]). There, a decision was made to preemptively chill the radio of its "affects and percepts"[D]. I'm not entirely sure what the concerning response to hearing Lennon's "Imagine" was supposed to be and less so for "She's not there" by the Zombies. [☃] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilling_effect#:~:text=13%5D%5Bfailed%20verification%5D-,Chilling%20effects%20on%20Wikipedia%20users,-%5Bedit%5D [♪] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Channel_memorandum [⏚] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996 [D] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affect_(philosophy)#In_Deleuze_and_Guattari
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
