Maybe it is more useful to define "real" in terms of systems. We know that 
"emergence" can lead to new systems which can interact and collide with the old 
one. Here is a recent paper from Oriol Artime and Manilo De Domenico about 
emergence.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/toc/rsta/2022/380/2227One system 
is the biological world of DNA, RNA, amino acids and all the stuff you can 
build from it: animals, plants, bacteria, etc. The other system is the world of 
words and language. Now we can say an idea in one system is real if there is a 
corresponding element in the other. The idea of a fire-breathing dragon for 
instance is unreal. People came up with it when they first stumbled upon 
dinosaur bones. The idea of a dinosaur like a T-Rex or a Triceratops is 
probably real, because scientists have evidence for the existence of dinosaurs 
in the biological world of the past.-J.
-------- Original message --------From: Eric Charles 
<[email protected]> Date: 6/3/22  05:28  (GMT+01:00) To: The 
Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 
[FRIAM] Peirce, Buddhism, Monism, Behaviorism, oh my! We can define it in many 
ways, but it is still worth considering that the more interesting question 
might be how the word functions, in practice. What is the role that 
confirmation-by-others plays in what what you, or I, or someone else ascribes 
reality to? How sensitive is that ascription to variations in 
confirmation-by-others? What other factors affect the ascription's strength? 
What weakens it? As for dreams: Plenty of people believe they have had dreams 
confirmed, both in their own direct experience and in the experiences of 
others. It really is a much more mirky topic than most give it credit for. On 
Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 5:29 PM Jochen Fromm <[email protected]> wrote:If we want 
to define "real" in terms of observers we could say an experience is real when 
other observers have the same experience in the same situation or context and 
can confirm it independently and subsequently.A squirrel we meet in the park 
can be confirmed by others and if we find out the place where it lives, we can 
observe it subsequently.A rainbow in the clouds or a movie in the cinema could 
be confirmed by other observers, but only for a short time and not subsequently 
in the time that follows.A dream at night can neither be confirmed by others 
nor repeated by oneself subsequently. We experience things that seem to be 
real, but when we wake up in the morning we see that they are not real. We are 
not able to confirm the experience. -J.-------- Original message --------From: 
⛧ glen <[email protected]> Date: 6/1/22  03:43  (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday 
Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 
[FRIAM] Peirce, Buddhism, Monism, Behaviorism, oh my! How many subsequent 
experiences are needed? 2? A google? And is reality defeasible? Eg if some 
experience is 'real' to me, then I get some brain damage and no longer get 
repeats, is the now unexperienced experience real?On May 31, 2022 6:05:40 PM 
PDT, Nicholas Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:>Dave, I think I 
disagree. Not all experiences have a character of being real. Only those that 
are confirm or subsequent experiences.>>Sent from my Dumb Phone>>On May 31, 
2022, at 8:27 PM, Prof David West <[email protected]> wrote:>>>At the risk 
of becoming a poster boy for glen's comments about cult maintenance and 
othering;>>It is the body and brain that are Illusion, the self Real.>>The 
mirage, the rainbow illustrate the emergence of Illusion. Raindrops and neurons 
are posited as ex post facto "explanations" and "causes" for very real, 
'perceptions,' 'apprehensions,' 'experiences' of rainbows and 
mirages.>>davew>>On Tue, May 31, 2022, at 12:59 PM, Jochen Fromm wrote:>> 
Interesting episode. Yes, Garfield apparently uses it to advertise his book. I 
like the mirage example he uses (at 11:00) to illustrate an illusion which is 
real as an experience and as a dynamic refraction process but unreal as a 
physical substance. >> 
https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691220284/losing-ourselves>> >> 
Daniel Dennett recently posted on Twitter a link to an article which contains 
the same idea, but for a rainbow instead of a mirage: perceiving a rainbow is a 
real experience of a colored arc, but also an illusion because there is of 
course no real physical arc at the place where we see it. >> 
https://www.keithfrankish.com/2022/05/like-a-rainbow/>> >> Maybe the illusion 
of the self works indeed in the same way? As whole persons who have bodies and 
brains we are real, just as raindrops in the sky are real. But when the 
billions of neurons start to sparkle in the light of conscious thoughts, the 
experience of a self emerges for a short time like a rainbow which emerges 
shortly from a million raindrops that bend the light towards the observer.>> >> 
I believe Jay Garfield is right when he says that we are able to construct 
ourselves as embedded beings. It is as if we are 6, 7 or 8 dimensional beings 
in a 4 dimensional spacetime where the additional dimensions are embedded in 
the others. This additional dimensions come through language and enable to 
specify a personality. If we consider a person from a 3rd person point of view, 
then the personality of a person certainly determines the behavior. This means 
everyone has a self in form of a character or personality. Even if it is 
illusionary or an unreachable ideal to be a certain type of person, such a type 
can be approximated. Our personalities can be considered as embedded abstract 
person types that we acquire and approximate in the course of time. In this 
sense we can say we have a self that guides our actions. And the abstract type 
is independent from us, since it could also be implemented in a sophisticated 
robot, android or AI.>> >> -J.>> >> >> -------- Original message -------->> 
From: [email protected]>> Date: 5/31/22 11:04 (GMT+01:00)>> To: 'The 
Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <[email protected]>>> Cc: 'Mike 
Bybee' <[email protected]>, [email protected], 'Grant Franks' 
<[email protected]>>> Subject: [FRIAM] Peirce, Buddhism, Monism, 
Behaviorism, oh my!>> >> 
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/282-do-you-really-have-a-self/id733163012?i=1000563340865>>
 >>  >> >> Jay Garfield promotes his book Losing the Self on the Sam Harris 
Podcast.  I can see no evidence that Garfield ever read a word of Peirce, but 
It’s fascinating how closely he tracks Peirce’s monism.  Fascinating, also, to 
see how Harris never quite gets it, repeatedly trying to drag the 
outside/inside distinction back into the conversation, while slathering praise 
on Garfield for eliminating it.  Reminds me of James’s failure to ever quite 
“get” Peirce.  But then it was James who died a neutral monist.  Oh well. >> >> 
 >> >> Reminded me of all the times that Dave West has accused me of being a 
closet Buddhist.>> >>  >> >> Nick>> >>  >> >> Nick Thompson>> >> 
[email protected]>> >> -- glen ⛧-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- 
.-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listservFridays 9a-12p 
Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom  
bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.comFRIAM-COMIC 
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/archives:  5/2017 thru present 
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/  1/2003 thru 6/2021  
http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... 
. / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to