In a similar vein:https://xkcd.com/2945/ -- rec --
Russel Munroe is so prolific and self-documenting, I wouldn't be surprised if he hasn't (somewhere) documented/attributed the myriad influences:
Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcxKIJTb3Hg>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 9:49 AM Marcus Daniels <[email protected]> wrote:Simulate from first principles: https://www.vasp.at/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Friam <[email protected]> on behalf of Prof David West <[email protected]> *Sent:* Thursday, June 13, 2024 6:11 AM *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] new math of complexity Naive, but honest question: Can a computer program be "complex?" Jochen seems to assert so, /"Every developer knows that each piece of code which is added makes the system more complex."/ I would say no, it only makes it more complicated. My answer is partially based on the fact that code must execute on a deterministic machine and the code itself (at least its compiled self) is nothing more than a virtual machine, still a deterministic system. Even the source code is a context free grammar, so none of the things that make natural language complex (context sensitivity, metaphor, interpolation) prevail. Otherwise the code would not work? A secondary motivation for asking, I am working on an extended monograph/book on how to intentionally 'evolve' complex systems like a business and the software that supports it,or ULS ( https://insights.sei.cmu.edu/library/ultra-large-scale-systems-the-software-challenge-of-the-future/ ), i.e., systems that *_cannot_* be "engineered." davew On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, at 5:30 PM, Jochen Fromm wrote: Emergence as a kind of “software in the natural world"? If we mean code by it, then yes, certainly. Every developer knows that each piece of code which is added makes the system more complex. Therefore we usually try to keep it simple. For biological systems it is the DNA code. For cultural systems it is the hidden code people do not want to talk about because everything related to it is sacred (at least for the group which it defines). The knights templar had their own code, the order of the cistercians, the Franciscans and the other religious orders and organizations as well. Cults and sects have their code ( which can be simple political slogans such as "Make Your Country Great Again", "Build the wall" and "Lock them up" or simply "Do not criticize the supreme leader"). Criminal organizations have their code. Ideologies and political parties have their code. Behind every complex organism or organization there seems to be some form of code or DNA that generates and maintains it. Whenever something is happening in nature it is either supper or pairing time. Obviously because the underlying "selfish" code has created bodies which have the directive to maintain and replicate themselves. If we look at cultural systems, for instance at political conventions or at religious congregations, then we notice that every time something is really happening at a larger scale is that the code becomes active. People come together to read or express laws, rules, guidelines and policies. So I would say yes, if there is a secret then it is the code. Definitely. Is there a new math for it? IMO it is quite hard to formulate the expression of such a code in general mathematically. For example how can you describe mathematically if the speech of a president or party leader or priest has bigger consequences or not? It is at least as complicated as calculating a path integral in Quantum Field Theory. What might be possible is to calculate a probability how a group behavior changes depending how frequent a rule is read, remembered and expressed. -J. -------- Original message -------- From: Roger Critchlow <[email protected]> Date: 6/12/24 8:05 PM (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]> Subject: [FRIAM] new math of complexity Speaking of emergence, any takes on Phillip Ball's article in Quanta? https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-new-math-of-how-large-scale-order-emerges-20240610/ I really liked his summary of the current non-explanations for emergence, but I haven't had time to read further. -- rec -- -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/ -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/ -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/ 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
