I would like to see some cleaning/clarification what is going on here - after 
this question to latex was raised.  What is the relation (if at all) between 
the function latex vom SetCategory and the system function output tex on? 
To my opinion there should be a relation, or even better, can we not put all 
code into the algebra to have hands on it? Or is there reason to have it 
somewhere else?

At least I want to have a "latex on", e.g. \[\frac{3}{4}\] and not 
$$ 
3 \over 4 
\leqno(1) 
$$

here some actual results: 

)set output tex on                                                              
                 
                                                                                
                 
q := 3/4                                                                        
                 
                                                                                
                 

        3
   (1)  -
        4
$$       
3 \over 4 
\leqno(1) 
$$        

                                                      Type: Fraction(Integer)
latex q                                                                      
                                                                             

   (2)  "{ {3} \over {4} }"
$$                         
\mbox{\tt "{ {3} \over {4} }"} 
\leqno(2)                      
$$                             

                                                                 Type: String
q2 := (x+y)/(x+1)


        y + x
   (3)  -----
        x + 1
$$
{y+x} \over {x+1}
\leqno(3)
$$

                                          Type: Fraction(Polynomial(Integer))
latex q2


   (4)  "{ {\mbox{\bf Unimplemented}} \over {\mbox{\bf Unimplemented}} }"
$$
\mbox{\tt "{ {\mbox{\bf Unimplemented}} \over {\mbox{\bf Unimplemented}} }"}
\leqno(4)
$$

                                                                 Type: String
(5) ->





Am Montag, 11. Oktober 2010 11:08:16 schrieb Martin Rubey:
> Alexander Solovets <[email protected]> writes:
> > Hello, developers!
> >
> > I am going to make TeXmacs plugin for Axiom/Fricas. I know that there
> > is already axiom plugin, but it seems to be poor and unsupported. The
> > idea is in following: generate expressions instead of pseudo-graphics
> > and them parse them to LaTex code. For example:   x**3 * x -> fricas -
> >
> >> x^4 -> Parser -> $x^4$ -> LaTex. I think something like that may
> >
> > have been already implemented,
>
> Yes.
>
> )set output algebra off
> )set output tex on
>
> (However, the routinges that do the texing, need work, I'd say.
> Especially tex grouping is not done in a satisfactory way.
>
> Note that efricas does display latex'ed output, too.
>
> Martin

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen 
Johannes Grabmeier

Prof. Dr. Johannes Grabmeier
Köckstr. 1, D-94469-Deggendorf

Tel.-pv. +49-(0)-991-2979-584, Tel.-mob. 0171-550-3789 
Tel.-d   +49-(0)-991-3615-141, Sekr. -154
Fax-p: +49-(0)-1803-5518-17745


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to