"Prof. Dr. Johannes Grabmeier" <[email protected]> writes:
> I would like to see some cleaning/clarification what is going on here - after > this question to latex was raised. What is the relation (if at all) between > the function latex vom SetCategory and the system function output tex > on? Oh, I didn't know about latex$SetCategory... I think it should go away. I think we had the discussion how things "should be" several times in the past. My personal opinion was that there should be a * domain InputForm containing all semantic information and a * domain OutputForm containing all information needed for typesetting. Domains like TexFormat, MathMLFormat, etc. should then have a coerce: OutputForm -> % My opinion was slightly shattered by the fact that mathml seems to need (or is able to process) *more* information than LaTeX. In any case, some of the output processing is (in my opinion: unfortunately) done in i-output, but a fair bit is in the algebra. Note that some domains cannot really have InputForm - at least not easily, Stream is an example. I think that just about all domains in userland should have OutputForm. Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
