On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:19:04AM +0100, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > I'm not sure whether that helps, but maybe you have to say something like > > foo := operator 'foo > > and look into ES for more about manipulation. > > You can certainly build you own expression tree domain for your > manipulations. perhaps I was not clear enough and it is better to state it this way: I would like to have kind of wrapper domain, which behaves like Symbol inside Expression Integer, yet internally carries the complete type information about the object it encapsulates. In other words, Symbols carrying information inside.
Franz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
