Ralf Hemmecke <[email protected]> writes: >> In other words, Symbols carrying information inside. > > You cannot have Symbol, because you cannot sensibly hide information > in there. The only thing would be to build a new domain that > encapsulates your data but behaves to the outside world like Symbol > (i.e. same category as Symbol has). I fear, however, that Symbol is > explicitly needed and not such a boxed domain that I've described. > > I'll have to look at it in more detail. But maybe you give a more > explicit example of what exactly you want to do. Just do so as if you > could box up your things and extract afterwards. I'd like to see a > concrete scenario.
You can hide in an operator whatever you want. Look at RECOP. Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en.
