On 05/17/2014 04:29 AM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> More generaly, I was looking at other problems with TexFormat and it
> seems that we should have a bunch of TeX macros to supply needed
> constructs. For example, for escaping we could use macros which
> provide special TeX characters, but of category "normal character".
No. As I said in a previous mail, my final fricas.sty contains a
definition of \spad, \spadtype, \spadfun, \spadop, that allows to write
verbatim text inside the argument. No TeX-escaping is necessary for
these things. The backslash escapes are added for the .ht output via
ht.awk (IIRC). For .tex output no escaping is needed anymore (after the
book.dvi patch) since that is handled via TeX-magic.
> In issue tracker we have report about missing ALTSUPERSUB in
> TexFormat. With proper TeX macro adding it to TexFormat would be
> very easy. Without such macro this looks like hard problem.
I'm currently not aware of a latex package that does something like this
supersub : (%, List %) -> %
++ supersub(a, [sub1, super1, sub2, super2, ...])
++ creates a form with each subscript aligned
++ under each superscript.
but I cannot imagine that we would be the first who want this.
I think, what Bill suggested (http://www.ctan.org/pkg/leftidx) looks to
me just like what amsmath \sideset does.
But maybe we should use the tensor package.
See bottom of page 2 of the pdf documentation.
http://www.ctan.org/pkg/tensor
Ralf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
