On 05/17/2014 03:17 PM, Bill Page wrote: > If we are talking about a replacement/upgrade of TexFormat then > perhaps the best long term solution is to handle line folding inside > TeXFormat. It would be natural to control this (e.g. line width) by > setting option flags as Waldek suggests. I realize that this might > involve a very substantial re-write of the package but most of the > required logic is already present in the texbreak C program.
I will not be the one doing that. The reason is that texbreak is computing the width of the boxes not with TeX-widths, but by some assumptions. The good thing probably is that TeXFormat has the source form of the expression while breqn.sty only gets the tex format and has less information about the semantics of the expression. If someone want's to put texbreak into TeXFormat, fine for me, but I will not be that one, because I think that output for .tex should anyway be small and not cover (waste) several printed pages. It's a task for the author of such a tutorial to give the reader understanding of what is happening instead of bombarding him/her with pages of output that nobody is going to read or check by hand. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
