>> I only care about the line breaking in the book. There it's not perfect, >> but good enough. > > Just "good enough" sounds rather discouraging.
Really? The problem is that it works (for the book in about 95% of the cases). How much percentage that is for an ordinary session, I have no idea. However, to get the rest *right* requires much more TeX knowledge than I possess. breqn.sty isn't a simple piece of software. Also linebraking by the texbreak.c program is not perfect. So "good enough" means that I am quite satisfied with what breqn.sty gives, but breaking equations is a task with a not so clear solution. >> I don't care very much about efricas, because I'm not >> using it with tex, but it should be an improvement. > It is a pity that you state explicitly that you "don't care very much > about efricas". Oh... OK, my statement wasn't quite correct. I should rather have said that I don't care much about the TeX output of efricas. But efricas is still the interface of choice until I have a nice webinterface. But I have problems with cut&paste. And a TeX output would completely prevent me from copying the output. Cut & paste is needed to put something into an email. Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
