My original patch gives "[]", yes, but I think this is better: 0*0 gives [] 0*n gives [] n*0 gives something like [] [] []
Almost every other system has this behavior. As for '_' as placeholder, it would be confused with an array of symbol '_'. Waldek's committed patch fixes display bug of n*0, un-committed patch makes 0*n output "[]" (used to be none). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
