On 18/07/16 16:23, oldk1331 wrote:
My original patch gives "[]", yes, but I think this is better:
0*0 gives []
0*n gives []
n*0 gives something like
[]
[]
[]
Almost every other system has this behavior.
As for '_' as placeholder, it would be confused with an array of symbol '_'.
Waldek's committed patch fixes display bug of n*0, un-committed patch
makes 0*n output "[]" (used to be none).
Thanks for clarification, looks good to me, thanks for doing this.
Martin B
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS -
computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
