If you post a concrete example, I can have a look. One thing is that sage uses ecl, not sbcl. The other thing is that the size of the output might affect the timing significantly.
Martin Am Montag, 30. Juli 2018 22:32:48 UTC+2 schrieb Waldek Hebisch: > > BTW Martin, have you looked at times at > > > https://www.12000.org/my_notes/CAS_integration_tests/index.htm > > FriCAS timings are done via Sage and I see much longer times > than when I run FriCAS directly (of order 25 times longer). > Why Sage slows down things so much? > > -- > Waldek Hebisch > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to fricas-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
