Martin R wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 1. August 2018 14:15:56 UTC+2 schrieb Waldek Hebisch:
> >
> > Martin R wrote:
> > >
> > > If you post a concrete example, I can have a look. One thing is that
> > sage
> > > uses ecl, not sbcl. The other thing is that the size of the output
> > might
> > > affect the timing significantly.
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > Am Montag, 30. Juli 2018 22:32:48 UTC+2 schrieb Waldek Hebisch:
> > > >
> > > > BTW Martin, have you looked at times at
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://www.12000.org/my_notes/CAS_integration_tests/index.htm
> > > >
> > > > FriCAS timings are done via Sage and I see much longer times
> > > > than when I run FriCAS directly (of order 25 times longer).
> > > > Why Sage slows down things so much?
> >
> > The 3 very first examples:
> >
> >
> > https://www.12000.org/my_notes/CAS_integration_tests/reports/rubi_4_15_2/test_cases/0_Independent_test_suites/Apostol_Problems/resu1.htm#1
> >
> >
> > https://www.12000.org/my_notes/CAS_integration_tests/reports/rubi_4_15_2/test_cases/0_Independent_test_suites/Apostol_Problems/resu2.htm#2
> >
> >
> > https://www.12000.org/my_notes/CAS_integration_tests/reports/rubi_4_15_2/test_cases/0_Independent_test_suites/Apostol_Problems/resu3.htm#3
> >
> >
> > all give times 0.208579s, 0.218311s, 0.237783s.
> >
> > What timings are you comparing against? In any case, I get roughly the
> same time in sage through the interface and fricas itself on my laptop.
I gave you times on my machine in the post. The timings above are given
by Nasser. What timing do you get?
--
Waldek Hebisch
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"FriCAS - computer algebra system" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
