> After more careful look at 'install.rst' I think that for now we > should go with plain text version. Namely, unlike README, > .rst version looks significantly worse than plain text version.
What do you mean by "worse"? That you have to write verbose inline stuff inside ``...``? That verbose code has to be put indented after a :: ? That different title lines have to be followed by some underlining? That is basically all of the markup I used. What you basically say is, that my conversion was work-done-for-nothing. My concern is now that you change the current INSTALL file. Synchronization with my install.rst will be hard since I restructured a bit. Are you afraid of writing .rst stuff or do you think that my install.rst is not nicely readable as plain text? I definitely want install.rst on the web and showing a plain text file on an otherwise sphinx-generated site would look very unprofessional. Can we make a compromise that you modify install.rst content-wise and I add/correct the respective rst markup? Ralf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fricas-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/18c57d99-083d-6276-b9fe-3ef5b8f189ef%40hemmecke.org.
