On Dec 3, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Frédéric wrote:
> >> Tout à fait, et en plus, pour chaque allocation type PI et AS, il y a >> 50EUR à payer en plus. >> > > vous pouvez noter que la mention de facturer le maintenance est pasé par > vote et il est laisser à la discretion du LIR de fixer le mointant qui > pouvait etre egale à ZERO. > > ensuite le RIPE est déjà mandaté pour fixer sa tarification qui passe > par aucun mode démocratique et sachant que les LIR ne sont pas > philanthropes , il est imposé un montant de 50 euros par ressource et > non plus forfaitaire, aucun doute que le LIR va répercuter ce montant. > > L'IP vient d'etre tout simplement privatisé... Pour moi, il s'agit plus d'organisation : http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-452.html Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region 1.0 Introduction The RIPE NCC has historically assigned provider independent resources without requiring a contractual relationship link between the End User and the RIPE NCC. This policy has made it impossible to maintain an accurate database of resource utilisation, as there has been no effective ability for the RIPE NCC to ensure that End Users keep their contact information up-to-date, and to ensure that resources which are assigned to End Users which no longer fulfil the original assignment conditions are returned to the RIPE NCC for re-assignment. The intention of this policy document is to ensure that the RIPE NCC, as the intermediate manager of provider independent resource assignments to End Users, can confirm that the End User exists, continues to exist and that they continue to fulfil their obligations to comply with the original assignment conditions. This position can be ensured by the presence of either an indirect or a direct contractual link between the End User and the RIPE NCC. > > no comment. > > a+ > > --------------------------- > Liste de diffusion du FRnOG > http://www.frnog.org/ > --------------------------- Liste de diffusion du FRnOG http://www.frnog.org/
