On Dec 3, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Frédéric wrote:
>
> Pour faire dans la provoc, avec la vaseline ca fait moins mal...
Il y a du pour et du contre.
pour moi , un "contrat" est une bonne idee, que ce soit payant, non, jetais
contre d'ailleurs ( j'y etais). Ca permettra d'eviter les abus.
Faire la chasse au /16 /8 des GM / FIAT, etc etc est plus important a mon sens,
mais visiblement ca n'etait pas l'avis de tout le monde.
De la a parler de privatisation :)
>
> a+
>
>
>> Pour moi, il s'agit plus d'organisation :
>>
>> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-452.html
>>
>> Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders in the
>> RIPE NCC Service Region
>>
>> 1.0 Introduction
>>
>> The RIPE NCC has historically assigned provider independent resources
>> without requiring a contractual relationship link between the End User and
>> the RIPE NCC. This policy has made it impossible to maintain an accurate
>> database of resource utilisation, as there has been no effective ability for
>> the RIPE NCC to ensure that End Users keep their contact information
>> up-to-date, and to ensure that resources which are assigned to End Users
>> which no longer fulfil the original assignment conditions are returned to
>> the RIPE NCC for re-assignment.
>>
>> The intention of this policy document is to ensure that the RIPE NCC, as the
>> intermediate manager of provider independent resource assignments to End
>> Users, can confirm that the End User exists, continues to exist and that
>> they continue to fulfil their obligations to comply with the original
>> assignment conditions. This position can be ensured by the presence of
>> either an indirect or a direct contractual link between the End User and the
>> RIPE NCC.
>>>
>>> no comment.
>>>
>>> a+
>>>
>>> ---------------------------
>>> Liste de diffusion du FRnOG
>>> http://www.frnog.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
---------------------------
Liste de diffusion du FRnOG
http://www.frnog.org/
