That's my whole point. On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 13:35 -0400, Dave wrote: > Wouldn't their press release indicate that they are actually keeping the > unit intact? After all, it IS the Office of Disinformation. > > > William McAfee wrote: > > I have to say, the DoD would be crazy not to ramp up AFCYBER. What > > reason on or off Earth do they have to intentionally not protect > > themselves against attack on the network front? It's crazy to leave > > yourself vulnerable like that, much less not have a method of offensive > > strike. It's like a country just now deciding to have an Air Force and > > then out of the blue saying 'Nope, sorry, nevermind.' > > > > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 11:39 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:43:11 EDT, Peter Dawson said: > >> > >> > >>> seems the cybercommand is not ramping up.. > >>> > >> A few years ago, the US Dept of Defense admitted that they had an Office > >> of Disinformation dedicated to feeding bogus info to our enemies. Of > >> course, > >> there was a public outrage for some reason. The only official announcement > >> that the Office ever released was a press release that they were disbanding > >> due to the public outrage... > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
