which propaganda ? you're spamming propaganda everytime you post.
But i understand why now : http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1049327.html "The footage also shows an Israeli soldier, believed by the military police to be Corporal Avraham Schneider, picking up stones and participating in the disturbance, instead of preventing it. " Everything is clearer than ever. 2009/1/22 Avraham Schneider <[email protected]> > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> > I called for John Cartwright to setup a non-technical cyber security >> > political full-disclosure mailing list some time ago, nothing was >> > setup. >> >> because he didnt want to - and theres no demand? >> >> > What are the solutions for splitting up full-disclosure into technical >> > and non-technical conversation unless two seperate mailing lists are >> > created? >> >> go off and create a yahoo or google mailing list for such drivel > > I second that. If he wants to have a list for different types of > discussions, the best choice is to just open one yourself. > > As for getting 'traffic' there, I doubt people would stop posting here and > start posting there (as nothing would stop them from posting it here). > > >> >> and let FD go back to what it was a few years back - readable and useful! > > FD is un-moderated and as such people can post whatever they want (security > related or not). > > Usually, people would avoid annoying others with non-security related > topics - but in the case of js-sentiner and co., one can expect some spam. > > Sometimes, when they decide to attack others (either with propaganda, or > just because they are bored) , those attacked have two options - either a) > ignore it or b) respond with non-security related posts and defend > themselves (or oppose their propaganda). > > As far as readibility is concerned, that can easily be accomplished by > either white or black list filters - i.e. if you only care about a certain > vendor's patch notifications, put a filter to get them and blacklist the > rest; if you care not to get any andrew wallase/avraham schneider/js > sentier/whatever/whoever conversations - set a filter for that - and you are > back with a readable FD. > > Just keep in mind that your posts requesting FD to go back to being > readable, are not computer security related either (at least without > wickedly twisting the meaning of the phrase 'computer security'). > > So for the same reason you find it OK to post your request (and it is), > andrew finds it OK to posts his (and it is). > > Not trying to defend n3td3v or anything - but there's some hypocricy here. > > >> >> ala >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
