yeah totally, i work for fucking IRAN punk, if i'm agains free israeli bull-shit, and n3tcr4p , then i'm ureleet or Iran propaganda or something EVIL.
this prove your closed-mind side which in this case turns in a fucking brown noze. 2009/1/22 andrew.wallace <[email protected]> > Remember in the Palestine war thread he accused you for working for > Mossad and being paid to post on full-disclosure. Though he > propagandas against n3td3v constantly to turn the world against me or > something. Maybe its j-f sentier who is paid to be here and propaganda > against things. He may not be a terrorist but he uses terrorist like > tactics to turn hatred on. j-f sentier's defence will be, 'but > 'Ureleet' done it so it must be ok to join in'. If 'Ureleet' told you > to jump off a bridge would you do it? > > Andrew > Intelligencer & > Founder of n3td3v > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Avraham Schneider > <[email protected]> wrote: > > The fact that he bears the same name as me, does not mean it's me. > > > > I don't spam propaganda - I invalidate yours. > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:16 AM, j-f sentier <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> which propaganda ? > >> > >> you're spamming propaganda everytime you post. > >> > >> But i understand why now : > >> > >> http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1049327.html > >> > >> "The footage also shows an Israeli soldier, believed by the military > >> police to be Corporal Avraham Schneider, picking up stones and > participating > >> in the disturbance, instead of preventing it. " > >> > >> Everything is clearer than ever. > >> > >> 2009/1/22 Avraham Schneider <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:35 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > I called for John Cartwright to setup a non-technical cyber security > >>>> > political full-disclosure mailing list some time ago, nothing was > >>>> > setup. > >>>> > >>>> because he didnt want to - and theres no demand? > >>>> > >>>> > What are the solutions for splitting up full-disclosure into > technical > >>>> > and non-technical conversation unless two seperate mailing lists are > >>>> > created? > >>>> > >>>> go off and create a yahoo or google mailing list for such drivel > >>> > >>> I second that. If he wants to have a list for different types of > >>> discussions, the best choice is to just open one yourself. > >>> > >>> As for getting 'traffic' there, I doubt people would stop posting here > >>> and start posting there (as nothing would stop them from posting it > here). > >>> > >>>> > >>>> and let FD go back to what it was a few years back - readable and > >>>> useful! > >>> > >>> FD is un-moderated and as such people can post whatever they want > >>> (security related or not). > >>> > >>> Usually, people would avoid annoying others with non-security related > >>> topics - but in the case of js-sentiner and co., one can expect some > spam. > >>> > >>> Sometimes, when they decide to attack others (either with propaganda, > or > >>> just because they are bored) , those attacked have two options - either > a) > >>> ignore it or b) respond with non-security related posts and defend > >>> themselves (or oppose their propaganda). > >>> > >>> As far as readibility is concerned, that can easily be accomplished by > >>> either white or black list filters - i.e. if you only care about a > certain > >>> vendor's patch notifications, put a filter to get them and blacklist > the > >>> rest; if you care not to get any andrew wallase/avraham schneider/js > >>> sentier/whatever/whoever conversations - set a filter for that - and > you are > >>> back with a readable FD. > >>> > >>> Just keep in mind that your posts requesting FD to go back to being > >>> readable, are not computer security related either (at least without > >>> wickedly twisting the meaning of the phrase 'computer security'). > >>> > >>> So for the same reason you find it OK to post your request (and it is), > >>> andrew finds it OK to posts his (and it is). > >>> > >>> Not trying to defend n3td3v or anything - but there's some hypocricy > >>> here. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ala > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > >>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > >>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > >>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
