Hello Brian!
Okay, enough already, this should provide everything we need to know:
http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/ip_photography.htm
First, this looks like a general rule-of-thumb kind of a text; revelvant
laws in UK might be more or less restrictive (especially with respect to
the latest additions) and, as we know, the devil is (usually) in the
details.
And to Solly's exact point:
http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/documents/ip_photography.htm#3.1
Brian, did you read that carefully?
] Using someone's image for commercial benefit
]
] Many countries recognize that individuals have a right of publicity. The
] right of publicity is the direct opposite of the right of privacy. It
] recognizes that a person's image has economic value that is presumed to
] be the result of the person's own effort and it gives to each person the
] right to exploit their own image.
]
] Under this right, you could be liable if you use a photograph of someone
] without their consent to gain some commercial benefit.
It seems you've just given Dr. Solly an argument -for- his cause :-) ...
unless you assume Microsoft is going to do what they're going to do for
-no- commercial benefit.
Peter
--
[Name] Peter Kosinar [Quote] 2B | ~2B = exp(i*PI) [ICQ] 134813278
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
