I still wonder. In Outlook 2007, your plain text reply was larger than the original HTML message.
I blame Word. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of der Mouse Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 8:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [funsec] The Day The Routers Died And people wonder why I dislike HTML in email! I don't think I've seen a case this extreme before, possibly excepting sokme with no content. > --_000_6DE0E9564904CB40B6688FA729ACF6581372AFC57CNAEXMSGC117re_ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > [5 lines 83 bytes, no encoding overhead.] > > --_000_6DE0E9564904CB40B6688FA729ACF6581372AFC57CNAEXMSGC117re_ > Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > [474 lines 24591 bytes, encoded; 433 lines 22793 bytes, decoded. The underlying content is the same as the text/plain portion.] > > --_000_6DE0E9564904CB40B6688FA729ACF6581372AFC57CNAEXMSGC117re_-- /~\ The ASCII der Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
